AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
21 paragraphs · 396 wordsR.C. Khulbe, J
This Criminal Miscellaneous Application, under Section 482 CrPC, along with compounding application, is preferred to quash the chargesheet dated
28.04.20014, summoning order dated 12.06.2014 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 918 of 2019 (Old Case No. 1826/2014), State
v. Aslam & Others, under Sections 324, 325, 504 and 506 IPC, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 2nd, Haridwar, District Haridwar.
In the present case, FIR lodged by respondent no. 2 culminated into submission of chargesheet, whereupon the cognizance order was issued asking
the accused applicants to face trial for the aforementioned offences.
In the compounding application, duly supported by the affidavits of the accused applicants and respondent nos. 2 to 5, it has been stated that parties
have amicably settled their dispute and the respondent nos. 2 to 5 do not want to prosecute the accused applicants. Accused applicants and the
respondent nos. 2 to 5 duly identified by their respective Counsel, appeared in person today. They admitted the contents of the compounding
application and stated that they have entered into compromise and amicably settled the dispute.
Needless to say, non-compoundable offence cannot be compounded. But considering the proposition of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex
Court in Nikhil Merchant v. C.B.I. & Ors, (2008) 9 SCC 67;7 B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana & Anr. reported in (2003) 4 SCC 675, and in Gian Singh
v.State of Punjab & Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, where there is a genuine compromise and there is hardly any likelihood of the offender being
convicted and continuance of the proceedings, after the compromise having been arrived at between the parties, would be a futile exercise, the
compromise should be accepted and the proceedings should be quashed.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the legal proposition propounded by the Hon’ble Apex Court, compounding application
is allowed. Compromise arrived at between the parties is accepted.
Consequently, the chargesheet dated 28.04.20014, summoning order dated 12.06.2014 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.918 of
2019 (Old Case No. 1826/2014), State v.Aslam & Others, under Sections 324, 325, 504 and 506 IPC, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 2nd,
Haridwar, District Haridwar, so far it relates to the present applicants only are hereby quashed.
Present criminal miscellaneous application stands disposed of.
