High CourtsSingle Bench

Aswathi P C vs Prakash T M

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 29 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 KL CK 0268

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.S.Dias, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 24
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 807 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 500 words

C.S.Dias, J

1.

The transfer petition is filed under Sec.24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to transfer O.P. No.810/2022 (Annexure 1) from the Family Court, Malappuram to the Family Court,Kozhikode.

2.

The petitioner’s case, in brief, in the memorandum of transfer petition is that, she is the wife of the respondent. They have a daughter born in their

wedlock. The marital relationship is strained. The petitioner is residing in her parental home in Kozhikode. There is no person to chaperon her from Kozhikode to Malappuram to contest Annexure 1. Moreover, the petitioner has filed O.P.No.1445/2022 (Annexure 2), O.P. No.1446/2022 (Annexure 3) and M.C. No.396/2022 (Annexure 4) before the Family Court, Kozhikode, against the respondent, seeking various reliefs. The respondent is contesting Annexures 2 to 4 before the Family Court, Kozhikode. Therefore, no inconvenience would be caused to the respondent, in Annexure 1 being transferred. Hence the transfer petition.

3.

Heard; Sri.B.Jayabal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Even though notice has been served on the respondent, there is no appearance for him.

4.

The law with respect to transfer of proceedings, particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another [2002 KHC 1889], Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel [2000 KHC 1835], Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [2016 KHC 6489], Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh [2017 (5) KHC 48] and Aiswarya N.C.V. v. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha [2022

(5) KHC 185(SC)]. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another.

5.

In the light of the law laid down in the afore-cited decisions, the uncontroverted pleadings and materials on record, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that Annexures 2 to 4 are already pending before the Family Court, Kozhikode, and the respondent is contesting the proceedings before the said court, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and order the transfer of Annexure1, so that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried, which would save precious judicial time and avoid conflict of decisions.

In the result, I allow the transfer petition as follows:-

(i) O.P No.810/2022 is transferred from the Family Court, Malappuram to the Family Court, Kozhikode.

(ii) The parties would be at liberty to move the Family Court, Kozhikode and seek for the consolidation and joint trial of all the cases between them.

(iii) The Registry shall forward a copy of this order to the Family Court, Malappuram with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in Annexure 1 to the Family Court, Kozhikode.

(iv) The Family Court, Kozhikode shall, immediately on the receipt of the records in Annexure 1, post the case along with Annexures 2 to 4.