High CourtsSingle Bench

Atul @ Shanky vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 23 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 MP CK 0105

HON’BLE JUDGES
J. P. Gupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 43074 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 277 words

J. P. Gupta, J

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed for grant of bail to the applicant who has been

arrested on 28/09/2020 in connection with Crime No.849/2020 for offences registered under Sections 34(2) of M.P Excise Act, police station Kotwali

Betul, District Betul.

Allegation against the applicant/accused is that from joint possession of applicant and other co-accused 80 litre hand made liquor was seized.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and he is in custody since 28/09/2020. Charge sheet has been filed and trial will

take time and the applicant has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of the applicant absconding or tampering with the evidence, therefore

his further custody is not required as trial will take time. Hence the applicant be released on bail.

Learned PL for the respondent/State has opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

Having considered all facts and circumstances of the case, in view of this Court, the applicant is entitled to get benefit of bail. Hence without

commenting anything on the merits of the case, this application is allowed. It is ordered that the applicant Atul @ Shanky be released on bail on his

furnishing a personal bond for the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of

the trial court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial and for complying with the

conditions enumerated in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of Cr.P.C

Certified copy as per rules.