AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 418 wordsThe petitioners-Mr.A.V.Narasimhan and Mrs.Arundathi R. Somayaji have filed this present petition u/s. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation
Act, 1996, against the Respondent- M/s.Narayanaswamy Super Speciality Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. for appointment of an Arbitrator on account of a
dispute arising between the parties under a Lease Deed Annexure-A dated 16.02.2012.
Arbitration Clause Article 19 in the said Lease Deed is quoted below for ready reference:
Article 19 -Dispute Resolution:
In the event of any dispute or difference arising between the parties hereto or as to the rights and obligations under this Deed or any breach there
of shall be settled by amicable mutual negotiations. If such differences or disputes as between the parties cannot be settled through amicable mutual
negotiations within 30 days of notice of such disputes, the same shall be referred to Arbitration by a sole Arbitrator to be appointed with the mutual
consent of both the parties. In the event parties are unable to mutually appoint an Arbitrator within 30 days thereof, the sole Arbitrator shall be
appointed as per the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and any statutory modifications therefore from time to time. The Courts at Bangalore shall have
jurisdiction in all matters arising out of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement. Arbitration proceedings shall be at Bangalore and in English
language only. The Fees and Costs of the Arbitration, including the fees of the Arbitrator shall be shared equally by the parties"".
Petitioners though served notices upon the Respondent-Company to pay arrears of rent, terminating the lease deed and referring the matter to
the Arbitration, the Respondent has not responded to such notices. Hence, this petition u/s.11(5) and (6) of the Act.
Both the learned counsels fairly agreed to the appointment of Mr.I.S.Antin, a Retired District Judge to be appointed as an Arbitrator to resolve
the dispute between the parties under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as per the Rules, in the Arbitration Centre at
Bangalore.
In view of the aforesaid, the present Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed by appointing Mr.I.S.Antin, a Retired District Judge to act as an
Arbitrator in the present case.
A copy of this order be sent to the Arbitration Centre, Khanija Bhavan, Bengaluru, for proceeding further in the matter, on administrative side
and also to Mr.I.S.Antin, on the address available with the said Arbitration Centre, Bengaluru.
