High CourtsSingle Bench

Ayush Saini vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 UK CK 0015

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 379, 411
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 887 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 419 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

Present Application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of Anticipatory Bail under Sections 379, 411 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in connection with the Case Crime No.683 of 2023, registered at police station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar.

2.

As per the First Information Report dated 23.09.2023, co-accused Sajeb, driver of the truck and co-accused Yogesh Saini stole the Truck (Registration No.PB65BC-8802) of the informant on 19.09.2023. Cement was loaded on the said truck. During the investigation, the truck driver and his brother Javed were arrested. The said stolen truck was recovered from their possession. Both of them stated in their confessional statements that they have sold the cement to Ayush Saini (present applicant), Hitesh, Yogesh Saini, Ishtekhar and Bunty. On the pointing out of these two, the police raided the spot. A co-accused Bunty was arrested. Police party recovered 225 stolen bags of cement from the spot. Remaining persons present on the spot (including the applicant) managed to escape from the spot.

3.

Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned AGA for the State.

4.

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. Nothing was recovered from his possession. He has no criminal history. He is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding, and, the said offences are triable by Magistrate.

5.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application.

6.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant Ayush Saini is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount on the following conditions:-

(i) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case;

(ii) Applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and he shall make himself available at the time of interrogation by the Investigating Agency as and when required;

(iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without previous permission of the Trial Court.

7.

It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

8.

Anticipatory Bail Application (No.887 of 2023) stands disposed of accordingly.