High CourtsSingle Bench

Azeez vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 June 2025 · Citation: (2025) 06 UK CK 0450

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttarakhand Protection Of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 — Section 3, 5, 11 · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 21
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 616 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 447 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

This Application has been filed by the applicant-Azeez for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.386 of 2025, registered at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007.

2.

According to the First Information Report, the police party received a secret information on 05.04.2025 that Azeez (present applicant) and six other named accused are slaughtering cows. The police party raided the spot and recovered 150 Kg. beef and other articles from the spot. All the seven persons managed to escape from the spot.

3.

Heard Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the respondent.

4.

Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He was not present on the spot. Nothing was recovered from his possession. Co-accused of the similar role, namely, Tufail and Sajjad have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in ABA No.361 of 2025. Applicant is not a convicted person. He is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding.

5.

Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder for the State has opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application orally.

6.

Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

7.

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present Application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant-Azeez, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicant shall attend the trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(iii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case;

(iv) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court.

8.

It is made clear that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.