High CourtsSingle Bench

Babban Singh And Ors vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 6 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 JH CK 0018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Jharkhand Bovine Cattle (Prohibition Of Slaughter) Act, 2005 — Section 12 · Prevention Of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 — Section 11 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 1324 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 401 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.144 of 2020 registered under Sections 12 of Jharkhand Bovine Cattle (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act, 2005 and Section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960.

The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in transportation of bovine animals for slaughtering them illegally. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners is ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Seraikella, in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.144 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.