AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 416 wordsRatnaker Bhengra, J
Heard both the counsels.
The petitioner is an accused in this case for the offence registered under sections 25(1-B) (a), 26(3) and 35 of the Arms Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the police have recovered 5 cartridges, which was kept in the refrigerator, in the presence of the wife of the petitioner, who is co-accused in this case. The petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. According to the seizure list, two persons, namely, Kallu Singh and Asha Giri, who have inimical terms with the petitioner, were present, when the seizure list was prepared. Admittedly, there is no signature of the petitioner on the seizure list and, therefore, based on the inimical terms of the seizure witnesses, the seizure itself is doubtful and that the wife of the petitioner was very much present at the relevant time but her signature was not taken. The learned counsel has further submitted that as per the seizure list, 5 cartridges were recovered from the refrigerator, therefore, the same could not be used in the crime. The learned counsel has further submitted that the wife of the petitioner, namely, Geeta Devi, has been granted bail by this Court in BA No. 6445 of 2023 vide order dated 01.08.2023, therefore, he seeks parity. Moreover, the petitioner is in custody since 25.02.2023. Therefore, the petitioner may be granted privilege of bail.
Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner has another criminal antecedent and, therefore, he cannot be allowed to be scot-free in the Arms Act.
Having gone through the records of the case and arguments in the facts and circumstances, present petitioner, named above, is ordered to be released on bail on executing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Bagbera PS Case No. 23 of 2023, subject to the conditions that (i) the petitioner will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the learned Court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the Court and (ii) the petitioner shall also remain present on each and every date of trial before the learned Court below unless dispensed with by the learned Court below.
