High CourtsSingle Bench

Babulal Chhanda vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 25 September 2023 · Citation: (2023) 09 OHC CK 0227

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Satapathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 406, 420
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 4440 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 496 words

G. Satapathy, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

This is a bail application U/S.439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 117 of 2023 arising out of Subalaya P.S. Case No. 38 of 2023 pending in the file of learned S.D.J.M., Biramaharajpur for commission of offences punishable under Sections 406/420 of the IPC, on the allegation of cheating the informant for a sum of Rs.22,40,000/-on the pretext of supplying one Harvester Machine.

3.

Heard, Mr. R. Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned AGA in the matter and perused the record.

4.

Considering the rival submissions and the materials placed on record including submission of charge sheet in this case and keeping in view the pre-trial detention of the petitioner since 23.03.2023 and last but not the least, regard being had to the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vrs. Central Bureau of Investigation; (2021) 10 SCC 773, this Court admits the petitioner to bail.

5.

Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

(i) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail,

(ii) the petitioner shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.229-A of IPC in accordance with law,

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case and

(iv) the petitioner shall report attendance before the Jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on Sunday of every month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for six(06) months from the actual date of release from the custody.

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioner in future for similar offences on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case.

6.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

…………………………