High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 07 DEL CK 0139

Baby Suhani Kapoor & Anr vs Baby Suhani Kapoor & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 22 July 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prathiba M. Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 4448 Of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 16022 16023 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 604 words

Prathiba M. Singh, J

1.

This hearing has been done by video conferencing.

2.

The present writ petition has been filed by the father of two minor girls, who are Petitioners in the present petition and are studying in classes 9 and

5 in Rich Harvest Public School, Janak Puri, New Delhi (hereinafter, “Schoolâ€​).

3.

The case of the Petitioners is that they have been studying in this School since nursery and their performance has been good. Ld. counsel for the

Petitioners submits that the father of the Petitioners was running a small bangles shop at Shalimar Bagh for 25 years. The same was however

demolished by DDA in April, 2018. After the said demolition, he has been doing small jobs and was also working as a waiter in Swiggy for sometime.

Due to his poor financial condition and the COVID-19 lockdown, he has not been able to pay the school fee of his children and some amount of the

fees is pending as the Petitioners’ father has no source of income. It is submitted that due to non-payment of their fee the access to the

School’s online portal has been completely stopped since 1st April, 2020. Despite repeated e-mails being sent, access to the School’s online

portal has not been provided to the Petitioners. Hence, the present petition.

4.

Mr. Tripathi, ld. ASC appearing for the Directorate of Education (hereinafter, “DoEâ€) submits that the GNCTD has already issued guidelines

on 18th April, 2020 in respect of payment of fee during the lockdown period. Guideline 8 reads as under: -

“viii. Heads of the schools shall, in no case, deny ID & Password to those students/parents for getting online access of educational

facilities/classes/material etc to those students who are unable to pay the school fee due to financial crisis arising out of closure of business

activities in the ongoing lockdown condition.â€​

5.

None appears for the School despite advance copy of the petition being served. In case of non-payment of fee, especially in situations where the

parents are in an extremely poor financial condition, students ought not to be deprived of their education as in the present case. The Petitioners ought

to be given access immediately to the online portal and they ought to be permitted to participate in all the school activities as regular students of the

school.

6.

Ld. counsel for the Petitioners, under instructions of the Petitioners’ father, undertakes that the Petitioners would clear the dues at the earliest.

Since the School also has to disburse salaries during this period a balance needs to be struck. Accordingly, the Petitioners’ father is directed to

deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- on or before 24th July, 2020 along with a copy of this order with the School. Upon a copy of this order being received

and Rs.10,000/- being submitted by the Petitioners’ father, the School is directed to provide access of the online portal to both Petitioners so that

they can attend the online classes and participate in activities on a regular basis.

7.

Within two weeks from today, the School shall communicate to the Petitioners and also file before this Court a statement of the total outstanding

fee payable by the Petitioners’ father in terms of the guidelines issued by the GNCTD on 18th April, 2020. The Petitioners’ father shall make

an effort to also deposit a further sum of Rs.10,000/- on or before 25th August, 2020.

8.

Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing.

9.

List on 16th September, 2020. Order be uploaded forthwith to enable the Petitioners to approach the School.