High CourtsSingle Bench

Badal Chandra Das & Anr. vs Babul Deb

Tripura High Court · Decided on 31 January 2025 · Citation: (2025) 01 TP CK 1681

RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Interlocutory Application No. 01 Of 2024 In Second Appeal From Judgment And Decree No. 36 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 96 words

S. Datta Purkayastha, J

Heard Mr. D. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the applicants.

Despite the service of notice, the OP-respondent has not appeared.

Mr. Deb, learned counsel submits that in filing the appeal there has been delay of only 16 days and the delay was occasioned due to communication made in between the presently engaged learned counsel, Mr. Deb and previously conducting advocate at Ambassa.

The delay is very minimum.

Court is satisfied with the explanation as offered. Therefore, delay of 16 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.

Interlocutory application, is accordingly, disposed of.