AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 267 wordsThis application for bail has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.24/2019 Police Station Parbatsar, District Nagaur for the offence under Section 395 IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co- accused Ramesh @ Shanker, Rodu Banjara, Parsi @ Aisi, Raju S/o Privhti and Raju S/o Madan have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order 01.03.2019 in S.B. Misc. Bail Application No.2517/2019, against whom common/identical allegations had been leveled and the petitioner has been ropped in only on the basis of statement of co-accused.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the fact that the co-accused aforesaid have been enlarged on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that petitioners (1) Badru S/o Naru and (2) Gapti @ Gopi S/o Naru, arrested in connection with FIR No.24/2019 Police Station Parbatsar, District Nagaur, shall be released on bail; provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
