High CourtsDivision Bench

Bahadur Singh vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 22 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 PAT CK 0076

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 — Section 7, 9
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17227 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

40 paragraphs · 662 words

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s).

“(i) To issue an appropriate order/s direction/s including a writ preferably in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing the Demand Notice dated

22.09.17issued to the petitioner in connection with Certificate Case No. 251/2007-08, 237/2007-08, 50/2006-07, 01/2007-08 under section 7 of the

Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 35, 935/-,

36,037/, 67,375/-and Rs. 9,998/- on account of demand and Rs. 50/- in all cases within days of the receipt of notice if deying any liability file a petition

for denying the liability.

(ii) To quash the warning notice dated 21.01.2017 issued to the petitioner in connection with Certificate Case No. 50/2006-07, 01/2007-08, 237/2007-

08 and 251/2007-08 issued from the office of Certificate Officer, Nuaon whereby and whereunder he has directed the petitioner to make the payment

of arrears of amount i.e. Rs. 93,881/-, Rs. 12,728, Rs. 1,05,478.96 and Rs. 86,163/- and deposit the same in the Nazarat failing which warrant of

attachment shall be issued.

(iii) To quash the notice dated 10.07.21 issued from the office of certificate Officer, Nuaon directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,78,967/- in

twelve equal installments commenced from August 2021 in connection with remaining case No. 85(M)/04-05, 50(M)/05-06, 368(M)/04-05 failing

which legal action shall be taken.

(iv) To any other relief/s to which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.â€​

It is not in dispute that petition under Section 9 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 (hereinafter referred to as “the Actâ€)

is pending consideration/petitioner intends to file before the appropriate authority.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray that the instant petition be disposed of with direction to the appropriate authority to consider and decide the

same expeditiously.

Learned counsel for the State states that the appropriate authority shall consider and decide the petition filed to be filed by the petitioner under Section

9 of the Act positively within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner before him along with a copy of this order and the

issue of limitation shall not come in the way of decision on merits.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

As such, petition stands disposed of in the following terms:-

(a) Petitioner shall appear in the office of the appropriate authority on 18th of February, 2022 along with a copy of this order, on which date

documents in support of the petition shall be filed, or else file a fresh petition under Section 9 of the Act.

(b) The appropriate authority shall consider and dispose of the petitioner’s petition expeditiously, by a reasoned and speaking order, preferably

within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner before him and till then no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner;

(c) The authority shall also examine as to whether the amount in question falls within the definition of public demand or not;

(d) Needless to add, while considering such petition, principles of natural justice shall be followed and due opportunity of hearing afforded to the

parties;

(e) Order assigning reasons shall be supplied to the parties;

(f) Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(g) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the

same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch;

(h) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the appropriate authority, before the appropriate forum, if so required and

desired.

(i) We have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open;

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed