AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 151 wordsJustice Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:
That the writ in the nature mandamus may kindly be issued or directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on and w.e.f. August, 2002. It is further prayed that the petition may kindly be allowed with all consequential benefits.
There will be a direction to the second respondent to
look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. The decision will be taken in the light of the decision in Man Singh Vs. State of H.P. and others CWP No.1594 of 2008, decided on 27th July, 2009.
The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
