High CourtsSingle Bench

Balbir Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 17 November 2010 · Citation: (2010) 11 P&H CK 0100

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Chand Gupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 34, 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M 25180 of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 222 words

Ram Chand Gupta, J.—The present petition has been filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in case FIR No.

220 dated 16.11.2008 registered under Sections 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sultanwind, District Amritsar.

2.

I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully.

3.

It has been contended by learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner has been continuing in custody since 10.11.2009. However, trial

has not been concluded so far.

4.

Learned State counsel has contended that the next date fixed before the learned trial court is 23.11.2010 and only three witnesses have been

examined so far.

5.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that Petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true

facts in the Court, if released on bail.

6.

The Petitioner has been continuing in custody for the last one year and the trial is pending before the learned Magistrate. The same is not likely

to be concluded in near future. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular

bail filed on behalf of Balbir Singh Petitioner is allowed.

7.

Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Amritsar.