High CourtsSingle Bench

Baldeva vs Hindu Khandan Mushtarkha Devat Ram Banarsi Lal

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 24 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 01 P&H CK 0182

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Chand Gupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision No. 2623 of 2010 (O and M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 196 words

Ram Chand Gupta, J.—The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 11.11.2009, passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaithal, Annexure P1 vide which the application of Petitioner for ordering for removing of the entries of attachment from revenue record was declined.

2.

I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record.

3.

It has been contended by learned Counsel for the Respondent that parties have settled the dispute and the decree passed in favour of Respondent has already been satisfied and that hence, Respondent has no objection if the present revision petition is accepted and the impugned order passed by learned Executing Court is set aside and the entries of attachment effected by rapat No. 149 dated 22.07.1991 is ordered to be removed.

4.

Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is accepted and the impugned order, Annexure P1 passed by learned Executing Court is set aside. The aforementioned order of attachment of land of the Petitioner/Judgment Debtor is, hereby, ordered to be vacated.

5.

The present revision petition is disposed of accordingly.