High CourtsSingle Bench

Baljit Kaur And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 14 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0254

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 10407 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 258 words

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J

Case is taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a writ in

the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 9.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 9 and have

sought protection to their life and liberty. They apprehend danger at the hands of respondents No.4 to 9. The certificate and photographs evidencing

their marriage are on record as Annexure P-3 and P-4, respectively. Petitioner No.1 has submitted a representation dated 09.12.2020 (Annexure P-5)

to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3-State only at this stage.

On the asking of this Court, Mr. Avtar Singh Sandhu, Addl.

A.G.Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the present petition with a

direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali, to decide the representation dated 09.12.2020 (Annexure P- 5)

moved by petitioner No.1, and grant protection to the petitioners, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is made clear that this order shall

not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them.