High CourtsSingle Bench

Ballu @ Balveer Panthi vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 27 June 2023 · Citation: (2023) 06 MP CK 0093

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 161, 164, 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 342, 354GHA, 376, 506
RESULT
Allowed/Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Petition No. 27023 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 367 words

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant as he has been arrested on 21.3.2023 in connection with Crime No.159/2023 registered at Police Station Civil Line (Dehat), District Vidisha for the offence punishable under Sections 342, 354GHA, 376, 506 of IPC.

Prosecution story, in brief is that on 17.3.2023 at about 10:00 hours the prosecutrix was going to give his mother's mobile, the applicant on the way took her forcibly to her grandmother's house and committed rape upon her. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per prosecution case itself, prosecutrix was major at the time of incident. From the statement recorded during investigation under Section 161, it is apparent that she was voluntarily went with the applicant at her grandmother's house where other family members were also present. She was consenting party and no offence is made out against the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 23.3.2023. The charge sheet has been filed. Trial will take time to conclude and therefore, in the aforesaid circumstances, applicant is entitled for grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the respondent/State has vehemently opposed the prayer.

Heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

Having considered rival submission, material pointed out by learned counsel for the applicant, age of the prosecutrix, statement of the prosecutrix recorded during investigation under Section 164 of Cr.P.C and also considering the MLC report, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail, hence the application is allowed.

It is directed that the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before the Trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the Trial Court during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C.

This application is allowed and stands disposed of.

Certified copy, as per Rules.