High CourtsSingle Bench

Balwant vs Kuldeep Kanwar

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 6 January 2018 · Citation: (2018) 01 SHI CK 0049

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sureshwar Thakur
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-397>Section 397</a>, <a href=3863-401>Section 401</a> - Calling for records to exercise powers of revision - High Courts powers of revision · <a href=2489>Negotiable Instruments Act,
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
50 of 2016

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 395 words
1.

The instant petition stands instituted at the instance of the petitioner herein under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure and is directed against the judgment of conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shimla in criminal Appeal No.

31- S/10 of 2015/14, whereby he affirmed the conviction recorded by the learned ACJM-2 Shimla, upon the accused/petitioner, for his

committing an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act besides, affirmed the imposition upon the

petitioner/accused by the learned trial Court, of sentence of imprisonment for a term of one year besides his being liable to pay compensation

comprised in a sum of Rs. 2,75,000/-.

2.

During the pendency of the instant revision petition before this Court, the learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, have hereat made

a joint prayer qua this Court proceeding to record an order for compounding the offence constituted by the dishonour of negotiable instrument

issued by the petitioner/accused in favour of the respondent-complainant. The learned counsel for the respondent/complainant, has made a

statement without oath, of, the petitioner/convict liquidating the entire liabilities arising out of dishonour of negotiable instrument, vis-a-vis the

respondent/complainant. He makes a prayer in his signatured statement, that in case a sum of Rs. 15,000/- deposited by the petitioner/convict

before the Registry of this Court, is ordered to be released in favour of the respondent/complainant, thereupon this Court may proceed to record

an order for compounding the offence arising out of dishonour of negotiable instrument. The aforesaid statement rendered by the learned counsel

for the respondent is accepted under a signatured statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/convict. (i) thereupon this Court

proceeds, to, record an order for compounding the offence arising out of dishonour of negotiable instrument.

3.

Cumulatively, this Court is constrained, to order for composition of the offence arising from dishonour of negotiable instrument. In sequel, the

revision petition is accepted. The judgments impugned before this Court are quashed and set aside. The accused/petitioner is acquitted of the

charge framed against him. The Registry is directed to release a sum of Rs. 15,000/- deposited before it, by the petitioner/convict, in favour of the

respondent/complainant. However, the aforesaid order shall take effect only on the petitioner/accused, depositing, within three weeks from today,

15% of the cheque amount, before the State Legal Services Authority.