AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Ravi Malimath, J
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks the following reliefs:-
i. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant the petitioners (except the petitioner
no. 3, 4 and 11), as provided in clause 9.1 of “University
Grant Commission (Minimum Qualifications for appointment of Teachers and other academic staff in Universities and Colleges and other
Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations-2010†(Annexure no. 1 to this petition).
ii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to the petitioners no. 3, 4 and 11 as provided
in clause 9.4 (l) of “UniversityGrantCommission (Minimum Qualifications for appointment of Teachers and other academic staff in
Universities and Colleges and other Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations-2010â€.
iii. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner and against
the respondents.
iv. Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.
Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3, in their counter-affidavit, have stated in para no. 15 as follows:-
That in view of the order dated 23-4-2010 the resolution of the Executive Council dated 28-2-2020 in the concerned matter could not be
given effect to as such no further action could not be taken in the matter and thereafter the University could not convene the meeting of the
Executive Council because of Covid-19 but now the University has called a meeting of the Executive Council to be held on 27-11-2020 in
which the matter will be again placed for getting its approval and as soon as the Executive Council as well as Chancellor of the University
will grant its approval the non-compounded advance increments shall be given to the petitioners within 3 weeks thereafter from the due date
of their eligibility.
In view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition can be disposed-off in terms of the said para.
Consequently, the petition is disposed-off in terms of the statement made by respondent nos. 2 and 3, in para no.15 of their counter-affidavit.
Furthermore, the learned standing counsel assures that the Chancellor will pass necessary order in a period of eight weeks from today.
 5. His submission is placed on record.
The writ-petition stands disposed-off accordingly.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed-off.
