AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 257 wordsPrayer in these three petitions is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.11 dated 15.04.2018 under Section 21(1) of the Mines and
Minerals Act, 1957, registered at Police Station Sadar Pathankot.
While granting interim bail to the petitioners, following order was passed on 14.06.2018: -
“Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners are the drivers/registered owners of the truck, which was used as a carrier for
transporting the mines or minerals. It is further submitted that the petitioners were in possession of the valid Weighment Slips (Annexures P1 and P2)
issued by the Department in Form  T. It is also submitted that as per Rules 72 and 75 of the Punjab Mines and Minerals Rules, 2013, a transporter
can carry the mines by way of a valid Weighment Slips and further as per Rule 75, even in case of a first offender, the same can be compounded on
payment of fine as per the procedure prescribed therein.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in pursuance of the order dated 14.06.2018, petitioners have joined the investigation and are not
required for any further investigation.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Parvesh Kumar, has not disputed the factual position and states that the petitioners are no more
required for any further investigation.
In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 14.06.2018 passed by this Court is made
absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
