High CourtsDivision Bench

Banambar Pradhan (Since Dead), Represented Through His Lrs. And Another vs Dasarathi Panda (Since Dead) Represented Through His Lrs. And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 15 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 OHC CK 0091

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ · A.K. Mohapatra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 429 Of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 123 words

Misc. Case No.809 of 2010

1.

For the reasons stated therein, this application for condonation of delay of 8 days in filing the appeal is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

W.A. No.429 of 2010

2.

The judgment of the learned Single Judge was in writ petitions filed against an order of the Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa in OLR Revision Cases. Such a writ petition obviously is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the impugned order is also only in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution.

3.

In the circumstances, this intra-court appeal against such an order would not be maintainable. On this short ground, the writ appeal is dismissed.

............................