High CourtsDivision Bench

Bandhu Naik vs Lakhi Kuar and Another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 14 January 1885 · Citation: (1885) ILR (All) 342

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Comer Petheram, C.J · Brodhurst, J
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 118 words

W. Comer Petheram, C.J.—We think that the appeal must be allowed, and the suit tried again. The question is, whether it has been tried. The trial was commenced by the Subordinate Judge, and the suit was then transferred by the District Judge to his own file u/s 25 of the Civil Procedure Code. By that section the District Judge had power to transfer and try it. But inasmuch as the evidence was not taken before the District Judge, we do not think that he has tried the case. The decree must be set aside, and the case remanded to the Court which has cognizance of suits of the nature of the present one for trial on the merits.