Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 07 NCLT CK 0029

Bank Of Baroda vs Rotomac Global Pvt Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 12 July 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnam Singh Thakur, Member (J) · Subrata Kumar Dash, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CP (IB) No. 70/ALD/2017 IN IA No. 74/2021 CA No. 231 Of 2018, IA No. 350 Of 2020, 116, 119 Of 2022, MA No. 9 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 174 words

IA No. 153/2022

The present application has been filed for substitution of applicant in the application under Section 7 in place of original applicant i.e. Bank of India based on assignment agreement dated 30th March, 2022, duly registered on 18th May, 2022. The original financial creditor, i.e. Bank of India has stated stated that he has no objection if the substitution is allowed.

Mr. Shubham Agarwal, Advocate for the Corporate Debtor stated that he has no objection if the application for substitution is allowed on the basis of assignment agreement dated 30th March, 2022.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances, the substitution application is allowed and the applicant is entitled to pursue the application under Section 7 of IBC,2016 originally filed by Bank of India. Amended memo of parties be taken on record. The application is allowed accordingly.

Pleadings are complete. Let the short written submissions be filed by both the sides with the relevant case law within two weeks after exchanging with each other.

The matter be listed on 20th September, 2022.