High CourtsSingle Bench

Basant Prabhakar vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 1 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 UK CK 0008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 59
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 468 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 339 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:-

(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to registered the new vehicle having registration UA 04 5489 of

the petitioner for mining work having mining Registration No. NK-1742 in place of old vehicles registration no. No. HR 38 G 4887 in view of the

existing and prevailing policy decision taken by Mining Committee Nainital in its meeting dated 20.11.2014 and 25.02.2015.

2.

According to the petitioner, his transport vehicle, which was registered with Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation, has become old and

unusable, therefore, he purchased a new transport vehicle and applied for its registration with Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation.

3.

Grievance of the petitioner is that no decision is being taken on his application for registration.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the question involved in this writ petition has been decided by this Court vide judgment dated

8.09.2020 rendered in WPMS No. 67 of 2020.

5.

Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, learned counsel for the Corporation does dispute the said statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

6.

Since the controversy involved now stands settled by the aforesaid judgment, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment

dated 8.09.2020 passed in WPMS No. 67 of 2020 and it is provided if petitioner makes fresh application for registration of his vehicle, which he has

now purchased, the District Mining Committee shall consider the same and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, within a period of six

weeks from the date of receipt of application along with certified copy of this order.

7.

The District Mining Committee shall invite objections from Divisional Logging Manager, Nandhaur Mining Division, Uttarakhand Forest

Development Corporation before taking any decision on petitioner’s application. The District Mining Committee shall also consider whether the

vehicle, which is sought to be registered, fulfils the condition regarding age limit, if any, prescribed under Section 59 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.