High CourtsFull Bench

Bassider Ruhman Khondkhar and Another vs Rajendronath Mookhopadhya

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 4 September 1876 · Citation: (1877) ILR (Cal) 147

HON’BLE JUDGES
Richard Garth, C.J · Markby, J · Macpherson, J · Kemp, J · Jackson, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 70 words

Richard Garth, C.J.—We are of opinion that, in the case of a ryot of the class specified in the question referred to us,--i.e., a ryot whose tenancy can only be determined by a reasonable notice to quit expiring at the end of the year,--the ryot can claim to have a suit for ejectment brought against him by his landlord dismissed on the ground that he has had no such notice.