High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhagat Ram vs State Of H.P

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 29 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 SHI CK 0452

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Singh Thakur, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 1195 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 195 words

Vivek Singh Thakur, J

1.

Status report stands filed.

2.

Learned Deputy Advocate General, as per instructions received, submits that fourteen witnesses have been examined and for examining remaining eleven witnesses, case has been fixed w.e.f. 30.10.2020, 31.10.2020 and 02.11.2020.

3.

At this stage, under instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh and also with a request for direction to the trial Court to ensure recording of evidence at the earliest.

4.

In my opinion, an accused has a right to file successive bail applications, as permissible under law, and no liberty of this Court is necessary for filing such bail application either in this Court or in the Court of Sessions Judge having jurisdiction to decide the same.

5.

In view of above, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to the trial Court to ensure recording of evidence on the dates already fixed and make an endeavour to conclude the trial at the earliest.

6.

Needless to say that parties shall ensure their effective appearance before the trial Court enabling it to record the evidence and to avoid any unnecessary adjournments.