High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhagat Singh vs Narcotic Control Bureau

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 27 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 SHI CK 0282

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437A, 439, 446
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No.128 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

52 paragraphs · 1,028 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

An under-trial prisoner, who is facing trial for possessing Charas, has come up before this Court under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), seeking interim bail, on the ground that the marriage of his son is fixed for 3rd to 5th February, 2021.

2.

The bail petition is silent about criminal history, however, Mr. Abhishek Negi, learned Counsel for the bail petitioner states on instructions that the

petitioner has no criminal past relating to the offences prescribing sentence of seven years and more, or when on conviction, the sentence imposed

was more than three years.

3.

Mr. Ashwani Pathak, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate submits that in case this Court grants interim bail to the

petitioner then the Court must specify the date on which the petitioner would surrender.

4.

In the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, the petitioner makes out a case for release on bail.

5.

Given the contention that the marriage of his son is fixed for 3rd to 5th February, 2021 and furthermore that he is apparently not of flight risk, this

Court grants him interim bail for a period of two weeks, subject to the conditions mentioned below with outer limit that he must furnish bail bonds well

in time and if he fails to furnish the bail bonds in time, still he must surrender before the concerned Jail by 12th Feb 2021 at 4.00 p.m. latest, and that in

case he furnishes bail bonds earlier then immediately on the expiry of fourteen days. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall also supply the phone

number of the petitioner to Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned counsel representing the respondent-NCB. During the period of interim bail, the petitioner

shall keep the phone location/GPS always on the “ONâ€​ mode.

6.

In Manish Lal Shrivastava v State of Himachal Pradesh, CrMPM No. 1734 of 2020, after analyzing judicial precedents, this Court observed that

any Court granting bail with sureties should give a choice to the accused to either furnish surety bonds or give a fixed deposit, with a further option to

switch over to another.

7.

The petitioner shall be released on bail in the FIR mentioned above, subject to his furnishing a personal bond for surrendering in jail, for Rs. Twenty-

five thousand (INR 25,000/-), and shall furnish two sureties of a similar amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate having the jurisdiction

over the Police Station conducting the investigation, and in case of non-availability, any Ilaqa Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned

Magistrate must satisfy that in case the accused fails to appear in Court, then such sureties are capable to produce the accused before the Court,

keeping in mind the Jurisprudence behind the sureties, which is to secure the presence of the accused.

8.

In the alternative, the petitioner may furnish aforesaid personal bond and fixed deposit(s) for Rs. Twenty-five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), made

in favour of ""Chief Judicial Magistrate, having the jurisdiction over the Police Station conducting the investigation

a) Such Fixed deposits may be made from any of the banks where the stake of the State is more than 50%, or any of the stable private banks, e.g.,

HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, etc., with the clause of automatic renewal of principal, and liberty of the interest reverting to the

linked account.

b) Such a fixed deposit need not necessarily be made from the account of the petitioner and need not be a single fixed deposit.

c) If such a fixed deposit is made in physical form, i.e., on paper, then the original receipt shall be handed over to the concerned Court.

d) If made online, then its printout, attested by any Advocate, and if possible, countersigned by the accused, shall be filed, and the depositor shall get

the online liquidation disabled.

e) The petitioner or his Advocate shall inform at the earliest to the concerned branch of the bank, that it has been tendered as surety. Such information

be sent either by e-mail or by post/courier, about the fixed deposit, whether made on paper or in any other mode, along with its number as well as FIR

number.

f) After that, the petitioner shall hand over such proof along with endorsement to the concerned Court.

g) It shall be total discretion of the petitioner to choose between surety bonds and fixed deposits. It shall also be open for the petitioner to apply for

substitution of fixed deposit with surety bonds and vice-versa.

h) Subject to the proceedings under S. 446 CrPC, if any, the entire amount of fixed deposit along with interest credited, if any, shall be

endorsed/returned to the depositor(s). Such Court shall have a lien over the deposits up to the expiry of the period mentioned under S. 437-A CrPC,

1973, or until discharged by substitution as the case may be.

9.

The attesting officer shall, on the reverse page of personal bonds, mention the permanent address of the petitioner along with the phone number(s),

WhatsApp number (if any), e-mail (if any), and details of personal bank account(s) (if available).

10.

The petitioner shall not influence, browbeat, pressurize, make any inducement, threat, or promise, directly or indirectly, to the witnesses, the Police

officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts of the case, to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police, or the Court, or to

tamper with the evidence.

11.

Any Advocate for the petitioner and the Officer in whose presence the petitioner puts signatures on personal bonds shall explain all conditions of

this bail order, in vernacular and if not feasible, in Hindi.

12.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the Petitioner can download this order from

the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer or the Court wants to verify the authenticity, such an

officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds.

The petition stands allowed in the terms mentioned above.