High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhagwan Prasad vs State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 2 July 2024 · Citation: (2024) 07 PAT CK 1551

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 — Section 32(iii)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10950 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 442 words

G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J

1.

The writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:

“…. for quashing the order

dated 15.10.2016 passed by the learned District Magistrate – cum - Collector, Lakhisarai in Supply Case No. 70 of 2015-16 whereby and where under who has confirmed the order of Memo No. 60 dated 02.02.2016 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Lakhisarai, whereby the license of the Public Distribution System Shop of the petitioner has been cencelled and the petitioner also prays for any other relief or reliefs for which he is legally entitled to, on the peculiar facts and circumstances stated in this petition.

i. For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authorities to restore the license of the Public Distribution System Shop of the petitioner.

ii. For issuance of any other writ /writs, order/orders, direction/directions for which the petitioner is found entitled to.”

2.

At this juncture, the Learned counsel for the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal. Section 32(iii) read as follows:

“32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days.”

3.

Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal available under Section 32(iii) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

4.

The Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he intends to file an appeal before the concerned District Magistrate, but the limitation period for filing the appeal has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the concerned District Magistrate to entertain the appeal in accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

5.

Taking into consideration that the petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing an appeal, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order before the concerned District Magistrate. The delay in filing the appeal shall be condoned by the District Magistrate, and the authority shall dispose of the appeal within three months from the date of filing of the appeal.

6.

With the above said observation, the Writ petition is disposed of.

7.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.