High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhagwat Sinha vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 23 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 CHH CK 0054

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 323, 376, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 4, 6
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 3162 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 425 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the applicant for grant of regular bail to

him as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 57/2021 registered at Police Station - Purani Basti, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence

punishable under Sections 376, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 & 6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act.

2.

It is submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is in jail since 11.03.2021. The prosecutrix was not minor

when the relationship of the applicant and the prosecutrix started. The prosecutrix has no objection in grant of bail to the applicant and she has

appeared before the Sessions Court and made such statement, which was not considered. Therefore, it is prayed that the applicant may be enlarged

on bail.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that that clearly the prosecutrix was minor on the date of

incident, therefore, her consent or willingness is immaterial, therefore, the application be rejected.

4.

The prosecutrix was virtually present before this Court on 17.06.2021 and she had made statement of no objection in grant of bail to the applicant.

Today also, the prosecutrix has appeared through Help Desk of District Legal Services Authority, Raipur and she has stated that she has no objection

in grant of bail to the applicant.

5.

I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this applicant developed physical relation with the minor prosecutrix on March, 2017, which continued for

sometime and their physical relation continued for number of occasions. Thereafter, the FIR has been lodged.

7.

Considered on the submissions. The minority of the prosecutrix has been disputed by the applicant side and further the submission regarding their

relationship based on consent is to be examined in the trial, for the present, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant

should be enlarged on regular bail.

8.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.

9.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to

the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.