High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 08 RAJ CK 0010

Bhairulal S/o Sh. Kana @ Ana @ Khanaji Gurjar vs State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 3 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.K. Lohra
CASE NUMBER
1071 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

45 paragraphs · 452 words
1.

Accused-appellants have laid this appeal under Section 14A

(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ''Act of 1989'') to assail impugned

order dated 12.07.2017 passed by Special Court, Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases,

Bhilwara (for short, ''learned trial Court''). By the order impugned,

learned trial Court has rejected bail application of the petitioners.

2.

The fact apposite of this appeal are that complainant

submitted a written report before the Police Station Baneda,

District Bhilwara which was registered as FIR No.75/2017 alleging

offences under Sections 143, 148, 149, 341, 452, 323, 325 & 307

IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Act of 1989. Investigation in the

matter is still in vogue.

3.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that FIR

was lodged after delay of two days and there are omnibus

allegations against the appellants of causing injury to the victim.

Learned counsel further submits that as per injury report, only

one injury received by the victim is reported to be grievous in

nature but not dangerous to life and therefore, prima facie,

offence under Section 307 IPC is not made out.

4.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal and

submits that looking to the gravity and magnitude of offences

attributed to the appellants, no interference with the impugned

order is warranted. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that

the learned trial Court, in its discretion, has declined the prayer

for bail to the appellants which is not liable to be tinkered with in

exercise of appellate jurisdiction.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and upon perusal of the impugned order

and the case diary, in my opinion, learned trial Court has not

examined the matter in right perspective while considering bail

application of the appellants.

6.

Accordingly, the instant appeal is allowed and the impugned

order passed by learned trial Court is set aside. As a consequence

of setting aside of the impugned order, the bail application of the

appellants is allowed and it is ordered that accused-appellant, (1)

Bhairulal S/o Sh. Kana @ Ana @ Khanji Gurjar, (2) Mahadev S/o

Sh. Sabla Gurjar, (3) Mishrilal S/o Sh. Urjan Ji Gurjar, (4) Panna

S/o Sh. Urjan Ji Gujar, and (5) Kundanlal S/o Sawatalal Gurjar,

arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.75/2017 Police Station

Baneda, District Bhilwara, may be released on bail; provided each

of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety

bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates

of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.