High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhajan Lal vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 9 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 RAJ CK 0049

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 201, 302, 377
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2617 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 389 words

@JUDGEMENTTAG- JUDGEMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.615/2021 registered at Police Station Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 377 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

The first bail application was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 14.09.2023 with liberty to file afresh after recording the statement of witnesses – Karan Singh, Gurvindra Singh and Kesu Ram.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now witness Kesu Ram has been examined before the trial Court as PW.3 and he has declared hostile, and witnesses Karan Singh and Gurvindra Singh have been examined before the trial Court as PW.5 & PW.6 and there are material contradictions in their statements. Counsel submits that chance print has been obtained by the Investigating

Officer and Director of Finger Print Bureau Rajasthan, Jaipur has mentioned in the report that due to ambiguity of the said chance print, the same could not be tallied with the sample finger prints. Counsel further submits that the occurrence took place at spur of the moment. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.11.2021 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. With these submissions, it is prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer of bail.

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Bhajan Lal S/o Biru Ram shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No.615/2021 registered at Police Station Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.