High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhanu vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 UK CK 0124

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters And Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 — Section 2(b)(ii), 2(b)(xi), 3
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 963 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 146 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Bhanu is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.316 of 2024, under Sections 2(b)(ii)/3, 2(b)(xi) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Kotwali Jwalapur, District-Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail.

4.

This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.