High CourtsSingle Bench

Bharat Sen vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 29 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 MP CK 0129

HON’BLE JUDGES
J. P. Gupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376D, 450, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.44667 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 273 words

J. P. Gupta, J

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed for grant of bail to the applicant who has been

arrested on 05/09/2020 in connection with Crime No.290/2020 for offences registered under Sections 450, 376D, 506 of IPC, police station Surkhi,

District Sagar.

Allegation against the applicant/accused is that he after lurking tress pass the house of the prosecutrix committed rape with her.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is in custody since 05/09/2020. During trial statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded,

in which she has stated that the applicant has made sexual intercourse with her consent. In the circumstance, no offence is made out and trial will take

time and applicant's further custody is not warranted. Hence, learned counsel for the applicant has prayed that the applicant/accused be released on

bail.

Learned PL for the respondent/State has opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

Having considered all facts and circumstances of the case, in view of this Court the applicant is entitled to get benefit of bail. Hence without

commenting anything on the merits of the case, this application is allowed. It is ordered that the applicant Bharat Sen be released on bail on his

furnishing a personal bond for the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs.Fourty Thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial

court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial and for complying with the conditions

enumerated in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of Cr.P.C.