High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 CHH CK 0026

BHARATLAL SAHU vs UNION OF INDIA,

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 27 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJAY K. AGRAWA
RESULT
Disposed of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 1780, 1784, 1785, 1786, 1792, of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 205 words

Heard.

Office objection is over-ruled.

1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that their land have been acquired for NTPC Seepat Project but employment has not

been provided to them either by State or by NTPC, for which they have also made joint representation before respondents No. 2 and 4 but it has not

been considered and decided till date.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the Collector, Bilaspur after discussion with the NTPC has sought instructions from

the State on 12.10.2017 but no direction has been issued by the State till date.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

4.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 3 - Secretary, General Administrative Department, Raipur is directed to take decision on the Collector's

memo dated 12.10.2017 seeking direction expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order

and thereafter, once the decision is taken by the State Government, the Collector will do the needful in accordance with law after hearing the parties

within a further period of two months.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petitions stand finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).