Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Bharti Airtel Limited vs Union Of India

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 16 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 TDSAT CK 0028

HON’BLE JUDGES
Biresh Kumar, Registrar
CASE NUMBER
Telecom Petition No. 23 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 211 words
1.

Draft Issues have been filed on behalf of the parties which are available on record of the case.

2.

Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties and perused the record of the case, and in the light of the material available on record of the case, the following Issues are settled:

ISSUES

i. Whether the instant petition is maintainable in its present form ?

ii. Is the Petitioner entitled to a decree for setting aside and quashing supplementary demand notice dated 5.2.2020 issued by the Respondents ?

iii. Whether the Petitioner is further entitled to a decree for setting aside and quashing the rejection notice dated 22.4.2020 and the e-mail dated 22.4.2020 issued by the Respondents ?

iv. Whether the Petitioner himself has defaulted in the terms and conditions of the license agreement ?

v. Whether the customer acquisition forms of the Petitioner are compliant of DoT Circular dated 9.8.2012 and subsequent Circular dated 16.8.2016 ?

vi. To what other relief / reliefs the Petitioner is entitled to ?

3.

Four weeks time is prayed and allowed to the Petitioner to file their evidence affidavits. The Respondents may file their evidence affidavits within four weeks thereafter. Let the matter be listed for "Directions" on 2nd August, 2023.