High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 03 UK CK 0185

Bhawaan Sonaal vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 26 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 764 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 218 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

According to the petitioner, in the year 2013, he was running hosiery business at Gaurikund, District Rudraprayag, which was washed away due to flashflood. According to him, similarly situate persons, who suffered loss of property during natural calamity, have been compensated in terms of Government Policy; but, no compensation has been paid to the petitioner.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:

"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 16 lakhs alongwith Rs. 2 lakhs as mentioned in beneficiary list. (Contained as Annexure No. 6 to this petition).

ii) Issue suitable writ, order or directions in nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to give effect and operation of letter dated 13.10.2015 (Contained as Annexure No. 6 to this petition).

3.

Having regard to the facts & circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to District Magistrate, Rudraprayag, within three weeks from today. If such representation is made within stipulated period, District Magistrate shall examine petitioner's claim for compensation and pass appropriate order, in accordance with Government Policy, within a period of six weeks' from the date of receipt of representation alongwith certified copy of this order.