High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhimsingh vs Radheshyam

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 10 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 MP CK 0065

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 1642 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 197 words

@JUDGEMENTTAG- JUDGEMENT

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J

1.

The present revision is filed against the judgement dated 20.03.2024 passed by the Additional Judge from the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Dharampuri, District Dhar in Criminal Appeal No.20/2023 affirming the judgement dated 11.09.2023 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dharampuri, District Dhar in Criminal Case No.SCNIA No.08/2023, whereby petitioner has been convicted u/S 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act with sentence of RI for 01 year.

2.

Learned counsel for the parties have filed compromise application u/S 320 of Cr.P.C., which is duly supported by an affidavit. Parties are represented by their respective counsels and the compromise has been duly verified. The offence under Section 138 of the N. I. Act is compoundable.

3.

Considering the compromise arrived at between the parties, the present revision is allowed. The conviction and sentence of the petitioner u/S 138 of the N.I. Act is set aside. The petitioner is in jail. The petitioner is acquitted from the charges u/S 138 of the N.I. Act. He shall be released forthwith from the jail, if not required in any other case.

4.

With the aforesaid, the revision is allowed and stands disposed of.