High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhojraj Teli vs State of Punjab and another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 2 November 2018 · Citation: (2018) 11 P&H CK 0004

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No.49082 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 352 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.

Prayer in this petition is for quashing of the summoning order dated 18.09.2018 (Annexure P-1 Colly.), passed by the trial Court, vide which, the

petitioner has been summoned to face trial in complaint No. NACT/1401/2017 dated 24.08.2017 titled as Balkaran Singh vs. Bhoj Raj, filed under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in M/s Meters and Instruments Private

Limited and anr. Vs. Kanchan Mehta, 2017 (4) RCR (Crl.) 476 to submit that he may be permitted to withdraw instant petition with liberty to the

petitioner to move an application for discharge along with all the supporting documents and since the petitioner is an aged person, who is residing in

Pune, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in M/s Bhaskar Industries Ltd. Vs. M/s Bhiwani Denim & Apparels Ltd., 2001 (4)

RCR (Crl.) 137, his personal appearance before the trial be dispensed with and he may be permitted to appear before the trial Court through his

counsel.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of.

However, in view of the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Bhaskar Industries Ltd. (supra), the petitioner is granted exemption

from personal appearance before the trial Court, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) he will be represented by a counsel;

(ii) he will not delay/stall the proceedings of the trial Court;

(iii) he will not dispute his identity as accused;

(iv) he will have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in presence of his counsel;

(v) he will appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court and any other condition which the trial Court may impose.

In case the petitioner files an application for discharge within a period of 15 days from today, the trial Court will decide the same expeditiously in

accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months thereafter.

Liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh petition, if so required.