High CourtsDivision Bench

Bhola and Others vs Ramdhin and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 18 July 1885 · Citation: (1885) ILR (All) 894

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Comer Petheram, C.J · Brodhurst, J
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 139 words

W. Comer Petheram, C.J. and Brodhurst, J.—We think that this appeal must he dismissed. The simple question before us is, whether the Civil Court can interfere with the decision of a question decided by a Court of competent jurisdiction by a suit filed for that purpose. It is urged that the Revenue Court, whose decision is impugned, did not act in conformity with the provisions of the law. That would be a good reason probably for an application to correct that decision; but, so long as it stands, it is a decision of a Court of competent jurisdiction, and cannot be interfered with by the present proceedings. If the parties wish to dispute the correctness of the decision, they should take other steps. The decree of the Lower Appellate Court is affirmed, and this appeal is dismissed with costs.