AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
26 paragraphs · 823 wordsG.P. Mittal, J.—The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs. 3,80,000/- awarded for the death of Smt. Maya Devi by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 26.04.2001. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased aged 44 years was running a vegetable shop and earning Rs. 4,500/- per month. The Claims Tribunal declined to believe the Appellant''s case that the deceased Maya Devi was a self-employed person. The Claims Tribunal, on the other hand, opined that the deceased was a housewife. Relying on Lata Wadhwa and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Others, took the value of the gratuitous services rendered by the deceased as Rs. 3,000/-, deducted 1/3rd towards personal and living expenses and applied a multiplier of 15 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs. 3,60,000/-. After adding a sum of Rs. 20,000/- towards the non-pecuniary damages an overall compensation of Rs. 3,80,000/- was awarded.
The case is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Master Manmeet Singh & Ors., (MAC.APP. 590/2011) decided on 30th January, 2012. This Court noticed the following judgments of the Supreme Court:-
(i) General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum Vs. Mrs. Susamma Thomas and others,
(ii) National Insurance Company Limited v. Deepika & Ors., 2010 (4) ACJ 2221,
(iii) Amar Singh Thukral v. Sandeed Chhatwal, ILR (2004) 2 Del 1,
(iv) Lata Wadhwa and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Others,
(v) Gobald Motor Service Ltd. and Another Vs. R.M.K. Veluswami and Others,
(vi) A. Rajam Vs. M. Manikya Reddy and Another
(vii) Morris v. Rigby (1966) 110 Sol Jo 834 and
(viii) Regan v. Williamson 1977 ACJ 331 (QBD England),
and laid down the principle for determination of loss of dependency on account of gratuitous services rendered by a housewife. Para 34 of the judgment in Master Manmeet Singh (supra) is extracted hereunder:-
To sum up, the loss of dependency on account of gratuitous services rendered by a housewife shall be:-
(i) Minimum salary of a Graduate where she is a Graduate.
(ii) Minimum salary of a Matriculate where she is a Matriculate.
(iii) Minimum salary of a non-Matriculate in other cases.
(iv) There will be an addition of 25% in the assumed income in (i), (ii) and (iii) where the age of the homemaker is upto 40 years; the increase will be restricted to 15% where her age is above 40 years but less than 50 years; there will not be any addition in the assumed salary where the age is more than 50 years.
(v) When the deceased home maker is above 55 years but less than 60 years; there will be deduction of 25%; and when the deceased home maker is above 60 years there will be deduction of 50% in the assumed income as the services rendered decrease substantially. Normally, the value of gratuitous services rendered will be NIL (unless there is evidence to the contrary) when the home maker is above 65 years.
(vi) If a housewife dies issueless, the contribution towards the gratuitous services is much less, as there are greater chances of the husband''s re-marriage. In such cases, the loss of dependency shall be 50% of the income as per the qualification stated in (i), (ii) and (iii) above and addition and deduction thereon as per (iv) and (v) above.
(vii) There shall not be any deduction towards the personal and living expenses.
(viii) As an attempt has been made to compensate the loss of dependency, only a notional sum which may be upto Rs. 25,000/- (on present scale of the money value) towards loss of love and affection and Rs. 10,000/- towards loss of consortium, if the husband is alive, may be awarded.
(ix) Since a homemaker is not working and thus not earning, no amount should be awarded towards loss of estate."
The minimum wages of a non-matriculate on the date of the accident were Rs. 2772/-. Applying the ratio of Master Manmeet, the loss of dependency comes to Rs. 5,35,550/-(Rs.2772 + 15% x 12 x 14).
On adding a sum of Rs. 25,000/- towards loss of love and affection and a sum of Rs. 10,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs. 10,000/- towards loss of consortium, the overall compensation comes to Rs. 5,80,550/-.
Thus, there is an enhancement of Rs. 2,00,550/- which shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of the filing of the Petition till its payment. The enhanced compensation shall be equally apportioned amongst the Appellants. 50% of the enhanced compensation shall be held Fixed Deposit for a period of two years and rest shall be released on deposit.
The enhanced compensation along with interest shall be deposited with the Claims Tribunal within six weeks.
The Appeal is allowed in above terms. Pending Applications stand disposed of.
