AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
26 paragraphs · 513 wordsVivek Rusia, J
This is first application filed under section 438 Cr.p.C seeking anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime
No.620/2021 registered at police station Nagda, district Ujjain for the offence punishable under section 306, 34 of the IPC.
As per prosecution story Aziz was found hanging in his house on 6.7.2021 and on the basis of the report Marg No.39/21 was registered. Thereafter, a
suicide note was recovered by the police and according to which the deceased claimed that he purchased a 25 x 12.6 ft. plot from Abdul Shah on
which Abdullah, the husband of the present applicant, was claiming his possession. After the death of Abdullah his relatives were threatening the
deceased to leave his possession on the plot, therefore, Aziz committed suicide by hanging himself.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the husband of the applicant is having lease deed of the plot in question in his name. The copy of the
lease deed dated 5.2.2021 issued by the competent authority has been filed along with this bail application. Even otherwise, he submits that if there
was a dispute in respect of title of the plot the deceased had a remedy to approach the civil court, hence prays for the benefit of anticipatory bail to the
applicant in the matter.
Learned Panel Advocate opposes the bail application.
The family members of the deceased has not produced any registered document by which he is said to have purchased the plot in question. The
ingredients of section 306 IPC are missing in the matter as there was not abetment on the part of the applicant, therefore, as held by the Apex Court
in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar- (2014) 8 SCC 273 the arrest of the applicant is not mandatory in the matter. Considering the facts
and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, the
application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the aforesaid crime number, she shall be released on
bail upon her furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/-- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of
the arresting officer. This order shall be governed by the following conditions:
(a) the applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(b) she shall not directly or indirectly make any inducment, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him
from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(c) If the applicant is found involved in any criminal case of the same nature during this bail period, this order granting the benefit of anticipatory bail
shall be liable to be cancelled; and
(d) she shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court.
C.c as per rules.
