High CourtsSingle Bench

Bibitha Paul vs State Of Kerala And Ors

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 20 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 KL CK 0454

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anu Sivaraman, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 28039 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 254 words
1.

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

“i) issue a writ of certiorari quashing P3 and P4.

ii) Issue appropriate directions directing the 2nd respondent Director to reconsider P4 in the light of subsequent Government order i.e. Ext.P10 and to

issue consequential directions to grant approval to the petitioner as LPST w.e.f 01.06.2017 with all consequential benefits including salary.â€​

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader as well as the learned counsel for the Corporate Manager.

3.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, Ext.P4 order of the DPI dated 10.11.2020 was issued without considering the Ext.P9

interim order of this Court and the resultant orders passed by the Government in pursuance to the same.

4.

The learned Government Pleader also submits that the order of the DPI dated 10.11.2020 has been issued without noticing Ext.P9 order, which was

dated 13.10.2020.

5.

In the above view of the matter and in view of the admitted factual position that Ext.P9 and the later developments have not been taken note of

while passing the order dated 10.11.2020 of the DPI set aside.

There will be a direction to the Director of General Education to consider the issue afresh, taking note of Exts. P9 and P10. Orders shall be passed

after hearing the petitioner as well as the manager, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

This writ petition is ordered accordingly.