High CourtsSingle Bench

Bijender @ Vijendra Singh & Ors vs State & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0171

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 308, 323, 325
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.5029, 5083 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 401 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Crl.M.A.33384/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5029/2018

Crl.M.A.33571/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5083/2018

Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.Â

CRL.M.C. 5029/2018 & CRL.M.C. 5083/2018

1.

Petitioners in Crl.M.C. 5029/2018 seek quashing of FIR No. 1059/2015 under Sections 308/323/325/34 IPC, Police Station Ghazipur and the

petitioners in Crl.M.C.5083/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.1058/2015 under Sections 325/323/34 IPC, Police Station Ghazipur, based on a settlement.

2.

Subject FIRs are cross-FIRs. The parties are neighbours. Subject FIRs were registered consequent to a quarrel which took place between the

parties when the complainant in FIR No.1059/2015 was making additions and alterations in his shop, which was objected to by the accused in the said

FIR. A fight took place and both parties sustained injuries, consequent to which the respective FIRs were registered.

3.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of members of the locality and other family

members. Settlement agreement dated 10.09.2018 has been executed between the parties.

4.

Petitioners in Crl.M.C.5029/2018 have agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.70,000/- to the complainants in the said petition towards expenditure incurred

by them on medical treatment etc.Â

5.

Complainants/respondent Nos.2 to 7 are present in Court in person.Â

They confirm that they have received the said amount of Rs.70,000/-.

6.

Complainants in both the FIRs as well as all the accused in the respective FIRs are present in court in person, represented by counsel and are

identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled all their disputes with each other and are agreeable to the settlement and as

such do not wish to press criminal charges against each other any further.Â

7.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and

justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate

guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

8.

In view of the above, the petitions are allowed. FIR No. 1059/2015 under Sections 308/323/325/34 IPC, Police Station Ghazipur and the FIR

No.1058/2015 under Sections 325/323/34 IPC, Police Station Ghazipur and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are accordingly quashed.

9.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.Â