High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 04 PAT CK 0041

Bijendra Kumar, Son of late Ram Lakshan Rai vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 24 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
CASE NUMBER
6075 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

39 paragraphs · 394 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and State

Election Commission.

2.

The petitioner is aggrieved by non-consideration of his

objection filed on 27.02.2017 with regard to the error in the voter list

where it is alleged that voters of one Ward are shown as voters of

another Ward, as contained in his objection, copy of which is

Annexure-1, for Ward No. 20 of Danapur Nagar Parishad for the

ensuing 2017 elections.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in

terms of publication of the final voter list he had filed objection,

within time, before the respondents, but the same has not been

considered.

4.

At this juncture, learned counsel for the State and State

Election Commission submitted that the respondent no. 5, who is

required to actually look into the objection and decide the matter, be

directed to do the same within a fixed time period.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner agreed to the

proposal and submitted that the respondent no. 5 be also directed to

hear the petitioner while considering the objection and to pass final

order expeditiously.

6.

In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off

with direction to the respondent no. 5 to dispose off the objection filed

on 27.02.2017 by the petitioner before him, after giving opportunity

of hearing to the petitioner and reasoned order shall be passed within

two working days. Thereafter, the order shall be forwarded, through

the respondent no. 3, to the State Election Commission within the next

two working days so that elections are held on the basis of voter list

prepared in terms of the order to be passed.

7.

To facilitate the matter, the petitioner shall appear

before the respondent no. 5 along with a copy of this order on 26th

April, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. in his office.

8.

It is made clear that ongoing process, as per the

notification issued/likely to be issued, shall continue uninterrupted,

except for the fact that after the exercise directed by this order, if any

modification is required in the voter list, the election shall be held as

per the modified voter list. It is also made clear that the authorities are

required to look into the objection strictly as contained in objection

filed within time by the petitioner and only if the same is available on

the records of the authorities.