High CourtsSingle Bench

Bijendra Singh Pundir vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 9 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 UK CK 0036

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A · Prevention Of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 — Section 13(1)(a), 13(1)(c)(d), 13(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1327 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 154 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Bijendra Singh Pundir is in judicial custody in FIR No.1 of 2022 dated 06.01.2022, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 120-B IPC and Sections 13(1)(c)(d)/13(2) and 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, Police Station Narendra Nagar, District Tehri Garhwal. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that the co-accused, Vinay Kumar Chaudhary having similar role has been granted bail.

4.

Learned State counsel admits this fact.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.