High CourtsSingle Bench

Binod Kumar Dwivedi vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 28 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 PAT CK 0341

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashwani Kumar Singh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2237 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 522 words
1.

Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha,

learned counsel for the Lalit Narayan Mithila University..

2.

The petitioner seeks the following reliefs in the present writ petition :-

i. For a direction to the Respondents to pay to the petitioner the amount of revised gratuity in basic pay Rs.36,690/-(Grade Pay Rs.7600/-) on account

of A.C.P./M.A.C.P. Scale Rs.15,600-39,100/-.

ii. For a direction to the respondents to pay to the petitioner the amount of underutilized leave encashment 32 days and 268 days in basic pay

Rs.36,960/- (Grade Pay Rs.7,600/-) on account of A.C.P./M.A.C.P. Scale.

iii. For a direction to the Respondents to pay to the petitioner the amount of Part G.I. with 12.5% compound interest.

iv. For a direction to the Respondents to pay to the petitioner the amount of arrear of pension from July, 2013 to February 2018 on basic pay

Rs.36,960/- (Grade Pay Rs.7,600/-) on account of A.C.P./M.A.C.P. Scale Rs.15,600-39,100/-.

v. For a direction to the Respondents to pay to the petitioner the amount of D.D.A with 9% interest from 1982 to 1989 in accordance with law.

vi. For a direction to the respondents to pay to the petitioner the amount of Difference of Arrear of salary from March, 1989 to June, 2013 on account

of A.C.P./M.A.C.P. Scale.

vii. For a direction to the respondents to pay to the petitioner the amount of interest of gratuity and pension by the Government circular bearing No. P-

C-21-16179/3155 dated 07.11.1981 any pay penal interest upon entitle dues from the dates they became due till the dates of their respective payment.

Viii. Any other relief(s) to which the petitioner be deemed entitled.â€​

3.

At the outset, Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, learned counsel for the Lalit Narayan Mithila University submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of

with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University and in case of filing of such a

representation, the Registrar of the University shall look into the matter and dispose of the same within a reasonable time

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not oppose the proposal made by the learned counsel for the University.

5.

With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation raising all his claim before the

Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga (Respondent No.3) within one month from today.

6.

In case of filing of such representation, the respondent no.3 shall be required to look into the grievances of the petitioner and dispose of the same by

a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks from the date of its filing.

7.

In case, the claim/claims of the petitioner are found admissible, necessary payments should be made to the petitioner within three months from the

date of filing of the representation.

8.

In case the claim/claims of the petitioner are rejected, he shall be required to transmit a copy of the order on the address of the petitioner through

speed-post/registered post immediately.