AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
21 paragraphs · 366 wordsHeard Mr. Raj Kishore Sahu, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Manav Poddar, AC to AAG-I appearing on behalf of the
respondent-State.
This writ petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising
due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been
heard.
The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for a direction to make payment of salary to the petitioner from June, 1997 till today for the post of
Jeep Driver.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Jeep Driver in the pay scale of Rs.950-20-1150-25-
1500/- under the work charged establishment by the Regional Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Ranchi as contained in
Annexure-1. He submits that the petitioner has not been paid the salary for the above period. From the paragraph no.9 of the writ petition, it transpires
that the petitioner himself is not sure as to whether he is still in service or not and whether there is any termination order or not. The petitioner is not in
a position to say as to whether the petitioner is working at present or not. However, the petitioner has filed several representations as contained in
Annexure-4, 5 and 6 to the writ petition.
The learned counsel for the respondent State fairly submits that the authority concerned will take a decision on the representation of the petitioner
which are pending.
In view of the paragraph no.9 of the writ petition, the Court is not entering into the merits of the case, however, the petitioner is directed to file fresh
representation before the respondent no.2 within four weeks.
If such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the respondent no.2 shall take a decision in accordance with rules, regulations and
guidelines within a period of 8 weeks thereafter and will pass a reasoned order.
The writ petition [W.P.(S) No.842 of 2020] stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
I.A. if any also stands disposed of.
