High CourtsSingle Bench

Binoy Mathew vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 28 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 KL CK 0277

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 323, 325, 342
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1178 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 453 words

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.2613/2022 of Changanacherry Police Station, Kottayam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 120B, 342, 323, 325, 302, 201 and 212 r/w 34 of IPC.

3.

The prosecution case in short is that the petitioner along with accused Nos.1 and 2 conspired to commit the murder of one Bindhumon and in pursuance of the same, they invited Bindhumon on 26.09.2022 to the house of the 1st accused, where the petitioner along with accused Nos.1 and 2 had brutally manhandled Bindhumon, murdered him and buried the dead body in a pit. It is alleged that the 4th accused was present at the scene of occurrence and he gave intentional aid to the other accused persons for the commission of the offence.

4.

Heard both sides and perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that there are no materials to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and hence he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. He contended that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the petitioner.

6.

The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.10.2022. The final report has already been filed. The remaining accused, accused Nos.1 and 4 were already released on bail. Hence, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the petitioner is required for any other purpose. For all these reasons, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail on conditions.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of like nature while on bail.

(iii) The petitioner shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(iv) The petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(v) The application, if any, for deletion, modification of bail conditions or for cancellation of bail on the ground of violation of the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.