High CourtsSingle Bench

Bipin Kumar vs State of Jharkhand and Others

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 3 November 2015 · Citation: (2015) 4 AJR 765 : (2016) LabIC 349

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar, J.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.P. (S) No. 2774 of 2014
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 239 words

Prashant Kumar, J.—This application has been filed for issuance of a direction commanding the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization on the class-IV post. It is stated that petitioner was appointed in the year 1988 by the Executive Engineer as daily wages employee in Public Health Engineering Department and since then petitioner is working on the said post. Thus, he is entitled for regularization. It is further stated that petitioner along with others had filed a writ application, bearing W.P. (S) No. 2971 of 2001, wherein a Bench of this Court directed the Secretary, P.H.E.D. Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi to prepare a scheme for regularization of daily wages employee and if such scheme is prepared, daily wages employee be given preference over the outsiders. It appears that even after the aforesaid order, no such scheme framed. Therefore present writ application filed by the petitioner.

2.

Petitioner has nowhere stated in the writ application that he was appointed as daily wages employee on a sanctioned post. There is nothing on record to show that appointment of petitioner was made after following the procedure for appointment. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstance, as per the judgment of Hon''ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Umadevi and Others, , petitioner has no legal right to be appointed on regular basis. Thus, I find no merit in this writ application, Accordingly, same is dismissed.